Comments on: Path integral formulation of your life.

By: Jason

Jason — Tue, 16 Nov 2010 02:08:05 +0000

Well it all depends on your coordinate system. If you put money, or happiness on one of your axis, then life is very much a NON-conservative vector field.

By: David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E.

David N. Andrews M. Ed., C. P. S. E. — Mon, 03 May 2010 05:57:54 +0000

Seems that the path integral is the mathematical-physics version of the psychological Principle of Equifinality… basically the notion that there are many different developmental pathways to get from birth to death – and all points in-between. Indeed, life is very much a conservative vector field.

Basis for my interest in seeing where physics and psychology touch each other (ooh – er!):

BA-equivalence: Applicable Psychology, with a minor in Mathematical Sciences

M. Ed. in Special Education (Applied Educational Psychology)

C. P. S. E. in Educational/Organisational Ethno-Psychology/Psycho-Anthropology

I tend to cross the models over from one discipline to the other (e. g., the understanding that the very act of observing a system or part of a system inevitably affects the system… Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle in physics leads us to Stack Sullivan’s ideas of being a participant observer, and so on).

By: Daniel Earwicker

Daniel Earwicker — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:21:33 +0000

Everyone starts off alive, ends up dead, doesn’t matter which path they take.

Conclusion: life is a conservative vector field.

By: Fernanda

Fernanda — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:41:29 +0000

hahahaha! “bad part” is that is seems true!
=)

By: Fernanda

Fernanda — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 06:40:24 +0000

hahahaha! “bad part” is that is seems truth!
=)