<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday tattoo &#8211; Maxwell&#8217;s Equations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/</link>
	<description>Talk Like A Physicist Day : March 14, 2011</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 20:51:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawlzbawlz</title>
		<link>http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-5929</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawlzbawlz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 14:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/#comment-5929</guid>
		<description>^^He&#039;s right, they were pointing out its a dot product, not a cross product.

umad brah?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^He&#8217;s right, they were pointing out its a dot product, not a cross product.</p>
<p>umad brah?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benno</title>
		<link>http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-5887</link>
		<dc:creator>benno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/#comment-5887</guid>
		<description>You nongs...lol they are quite perfectly correct.

@borami: the first one IS a dot-product on his arm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You nongs&#8230;lol they are quite perfectly correct.</p>
<p>@borami: the first one IS a dot-product on his arm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fpsasm</title>
		<link>http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>fpsasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>&quot;Actually This is not maxwell Eq. or you misstake something

First one, Causs’s law, is not “X” it’s “.”

you should correct it or will be made fun of people.&quot;

It&#039;s  ?.D = p,  since D = ?E  ,  ?.E = p/?


I guess you get made fun of alot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Actually This is not maxwell Eq. or you misstake something</p>
<p>First one, Causs’s law, is not “X” it’s “.”</p>
<p>you should correct it or will be made fun of people.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s  ?.D = p,  since D = ?E  ,  ?.E = p/?</p>
<p>I guess you get made fun of alot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrfloppy</title>
		<link>http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-5849</link>
		<dc:creator>mrfloppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 12:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/#comment-5849</guid>
		<description>But, what are you saying? Equations are correct. Gauss&#039;s law, as you say, is the first equation (electric field divergence = volume charge density / dielectric constant (in his arm is particularized to vacuum)). The second equation (electric field rotation) is Lenz-Faraday law. Think before write.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But, what are you saying? Equations are correct. Gauss&#8217;s law, as you say, is the first equation (electric field divergence = volume charge density / dielectric constant (in his arm is particularized to vacuum)). The second equation (electric field rotation) is Lenz-Faraday law. Think before write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: borami</title>
		<link>http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/comment-page-1/#comment-5126</link>
		<dc:creator>borami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talklikeaphysicist.com/2008/tuesday-tattoo-maxwells-equations/#comment-5126</guid>
		<description>Actually This is not maxwell Eq. or you misstake something

First one, Causs&#039;s law,  is not &quot;X&quot; it&#039;s &quot;.&quot;

you should correct it or will be made fun of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually This is not maxwell Eq. or you misstake something</p>
<p>First one, Causs&#8217;s law,  is not &#8220;X&#8221; it&#8217;s &#8220;.&#8221;</p>
<p>you should correct it or will be made fun of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

